A short excerpt from zeroth draft of chapter "Learning to be a node"
The chapter is about how social networks depend on competent nodes and how competent nodes are made rather than born. I show how primary and secondary socialization help us learn what we can tell to whom when. Other sections in the chapter are about children as spies; discretion as a social achievement; humor, drama and the incompletely socialized node; the social organization of omniscience; and the social control of nodes in corporations and states.
For Jews and Christians, the most well known religious exhortation
about information behavior is probably the commandment "thy shall not bear
false witness" (Exodus 20:16, Deuteronomy
5:20), but sacred texts are rich in behavioral guidance for nodes in
social networks. The admonitions are
general guides for information behavior and suggest misgivings about humans as untutored
nodes in community communication networks.
The most
basic suggestion is to err on the side of silence. Imam Nawawi, the 13th century
Islamic commentator,
says
"It is obligatory for every sane adult to guard his tongue against
talking, except when it contains a clear benefit. If talking and remaining
silent are of equal benefit, it is sunnah
(normative) to abstain, for permissible talking might lead to something
undesirable or forbidden, as in fact is very often the case, and nothing
matches safety."
The book of Proverbs (21:23) suggests "Whoever
keeps his mouth and his tongue keeps himself out of trouble" and in Ecclesiastes
(3:7) we are reminded that there is "a time to keep silence, and a time to
speak." In the Christian New
Testament, Saint Paul exhorts the Ephesians
to "[l]et no corrupting talk
come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the
occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear" (4:29). The Koran is on the same page: "He does not utter a [single] word, except that there is, with him, [an angel] ready and waiting [to record it]" (50:18).
The
baseline recommendation, then, for nodes is mindfulness about what they
transmit; in a word, nodes should not always be "on." But all of these traditions go into greater
specificity about what responsible and socially competent nodes should and
should not "put on the network."
Both
Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions address gossip and
"tale-telling" as a continuum of network behaviors that require
regulation. Three levels are specified
in the Torah: mere idle talk; negative truths about others; and negative
falsehoods about others. The first, Avak lashon harah, follows from the
suggestion to err on the side of silence, prohibiting rechilut or “peddling,” prattling on, repeating things for the sake
of repeating them (Leviticus 19:16). A more serious network sin is for a node to
be a conduit for negative information, even if it is true, unless it is
specifically intended to improve a bad situation. Lashon hara
means repeating negative truths. The
most serious infraction is Hotzaat shem ra, slander or defamation through spreading untrue negative things about
others.
This
suggests an awareness that a community depends on actors to socially attenuate
what gets through to the network, to apply generic content rules to what
they do and do not transmit. And nodes
are not only prohibited from sending gossip along, they are actually also
enjoined from Mekabel lashon harah, accepting
and believing gossip or slander (Pesachim 118a). This is, perhaps, a recognition that the
temptation to pass gossip along is so strong that the only way to avoid it is
to prevent the information's arrival in the first place.
In Sharia law, slander,
gossip, and backbiting, or "ghiba"
is regarded as a major sin, perhaps more serious than adultery (Al-Ghazali 2008):
"O you who believe! Avoid much suspicion, for some
suspicions are a sin. Do not spy on one another, nor backbite one another.
Would one of you love to eat the flesh of his dead brother? Nay, you would
abhor it, [so similarly, avoid backbiting]. And fear Allah. Indeed, Allah is
Most Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Qur'an, [49:12])
The
excessive attention given in these traditions to the regulation of gossip
suggests a keen awareness of the deleterious effects of unregulated
communication networks. In
the book of Proverbs the transmission of gossip is connected to social
conflict: "Without wood a fire goes out; without gossip a quarrel dies
down" (26:20) and the destruction of relationships: "He who covers
over an offense promotes love, but whoever repeats the matter separates close
friends" (Proverbs 17:9). These
traditions are also aware of the non-linear effects of deviant information
transmission; in the epistle of James we read "The tongue is a small part
of the body, but it makes great boasts. Consider what a great forest is set on
fire by a small spark. The tongue also is a fire, a world of evil among the
parts of the body. It corrupts the whole person, sets the whole course of his
life on fire, and is itself set on fire by hell" (James 3:5-6).
Too,
nodes are admonished to eschew second hand information: "And
do not follow that of which you do not have knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the
sight and the heart - [you] will be asked about all of those" (Qur'an,
[17:36]).
In these
sources we even find attention being paid to the micro-sociological aspects of nodal
behavior. Rashi, the
medieval Torah commentator, notes that winking is a behavior common among those
who would traffic in gossip. "To eat the food of winking" was
understood as a way of sealing the deal – you spread gossip and your
willingness to break break proves your sincerity but the winking part means
that some folks are in on it and know it is gossip while those unsuspecting
hearers take it as reportable truth.
The counsel to prefer silence is not an absolute that
would shut networks down. Believers are
reminded that even as they are enjoined from spreading malicious gossip, nodes
still have obligations upon receiving certain kinds of information:
If you hear it said about one of the towns the LORD your God
is giving you to live in that wicked men have arisen among you and have led the
people of their town astray, saying, "Let us go and worship other
gods" (gods you have not known), then you must inquire, probe and
investigate it thoroughly. Deuteronomy 13:12-15
Another aspect of being a competent node is to wisely
pick the nodes to which you are connected.
The Book of Proverbs suggests that gossip reveals meta-information about
the gossiping node:
With his mouth the godless destroys his neighbor, but through
knowledge the righteous escape... A gossip betrays a confidence, but a
trustworthy man keeps a secret (Proverbs 11: 9;13).
A gossip betrays a confidence; so avoid a man who talks too
much (Proverbs 20:19).
This same observation also shows up in a Spanish
proverb, "Quienquiera chismea a ti chismeará sobre ti"(best-quotes-poems.com. 2007): Whoever gossips to you will
gossip about you. (worldofquotes.com
2013).
Publilius Syrus, a first century BC wit
also counseled picking friends on the basis of their nodal competence: "Count
not him among your friends who will retail your privacies to the world" (worldofquotes.com 2013)(Wikipedia Editors 2013). Horace (65BCE-8BCE) gives similar advice: "Percunctatorem
fugito, nam garrulus idem est; / Nec retinent patulæ commissa fideliter aures"
: Avoid an inquisitive person, for he is sure to be a gossip; ears always open
to hear will not keep faithfully what is intrusted to them (Wood 1899).
References